One by MSN is an ultra-luxury residential development on Plot No. 1 of the HMDA Neopolis layout at Kokapet, Hyderabad, promoted by MSN Urban Ventures LLP and marketed under the MSN Realty brand of the MSN Group. Portals and broker pages also list it as MSN One, MSN One Neopolis and One by MSN Kokapet, and roughly half the searches for this project use that inverted form. The developer's own typography is ONE by MSN.
This page sets out the whole anatomy of the project: who is promoting it, what has been approved and on what date, what the signed government order actually files, and every place where that order and the developer's own marketing say different things. It is the page the rest of this site follows from.
The reason it exists is simple. Fifteen live broker properties, a dozen property portals and the developer's own website all publish the same two figures for this project: 55 floors and 655 residences. The signed Environmental Clearance issued by the state environmental authority on 11 February 2025 files 660 residences and three towers at 57 upper floors plus a helipad and two at 56. That order has been in the public record since February 2025. We publish what it says, disclose the marketed figure beside it, average neither, and do not guess at why they differ.
The Project at a Glance
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Project name | One by MSN. Also listed as MSN One, MSN One Neopolis, One by MSN Kokapet, Onebymsn |
| Name on the filing | High-rise Residential Apartments by M/s. MSN Urban Ventures LLP |
| Promoter entity of record | MSN Urban Ventures LLP, incorporated 16 September 2021, RoC Hyderabad |
| Developer brand | MSN Realty, the real-estate division of the MSN Group, established 2021 |
| Parent group | MSN Group, a pharmaceutical business built around MSN Laboratories, MSN Lifesciences and MSN Pharmachem |
| Founder, Chairman and Managing Director | Dr. MSN Reddy, named by the developer in its own deck and on its own site |
| Address as filed | Plot No. 1, Survey Nos. 239 and 240, Neopolis Layout, Kokapet, Gandipet Mandal, Rangareddy District, Telangana 500075 |
| Coordinates as filed | 17°24'17.73"N, 78°18'16.83"E, being 17.404925, 78.304675 |
| Site area | 31,229.59 sq m, being 7.717 acres. Marketed as 7.7 acres |
| Residences | 660 as filed. The developer markets 655 |
| Towers | Five residential towers named AON, UNO, EKA, ODIN and ISA, plus a separate clubhouse block |
| Floors as filed | Three towers at 57 upper floors with a helipad, two at 56 with a helipad, over four to five basements and a ground floor |
| Floors as marketed | 55, which understates the filing |
| Configuration | 4 BHK only, in two variants - 4 BHK + M, and 4 BHK + M + HO |
| Saleable sizes | 5,250, 5,510, 6,465 and 7,460 sq ft |
| Ceiling height | 12 ft ceiling to ceiling, the developer's specification |
| Total built-up area | 5,08,494.17 sq m, roughly 54.7 lakh sq ft on our own conversion |
| Project cost | ₹1,000 crore in the environmental clearance |
| Announced investment | ₹2,750 crore, from the April 2025 launch release. A different measure, not a project cost |
| Environmental Clearance | Granted by the state environmental authority on 11 February 2025, Category B1, Schedule 8(b) |
| TG-RERA | P02400009393, published by the developer, registry-unconfirmed |
| HMDA building permission | 011159/BP/HMDA/2925/SKP/2024, published by the developer, not independently verified |
| Planning authority | HMDA, which developed and auctioned the Neopolis layout |
| Civic body today | Cyberabad Municipal Corporation, Serilingampally Zone, Narsingi Circle, Ward 125 |
| Main contractor | Shapoorji Pallonji Group, reported by Sakshi Post on 28 April 2026 and stated in no filing |
| Price | Not published by the developer at any level |
| Possession | Not established |
| Status | Under construction |
Who Is Building It
MSN Realty is a brand. MSN Urban Ventures LLP is the entity that signs. That distinction matters on a purchase of this size, because it is the LLP whose name appears on the environmental clearance, on the Terms of Reference application and in the address block on the developer's own contact page, and it is the LLP a buyer contracts with.
MSN Urban Ventures LLP was incorporated on 16 September 2021, at the Registrar of Companies, Hyderabad. MSN Realty was established in 2021 and describes itself as the real-estate division of the MSN Group. Behind both sits the group's original business, a pharmaceutical operation built around MSN Laboratories, MSN Lifesciences and MSN Pharmachem, founded and chaired by Dr. MSN Reddy, which crossed US$1 billion in revenue in FY2023-24.
One by MSN is the group's first real-estate project. Its own sales deck says so, in its own opening line. Both halves of what that means belong in the same paragraph: no completed projects, no delivered square feet and no families served, and equally no complaints, no adverse orders and no delivery delays. TG-RERA's Orders, Orders of Authority, Proceedings, Public Notices, Revoked and Defaulters lists return zero occurrences of "MSN", read on 31 August 2026. A clean record that exists because nothing has been delivered is not the same thing as a proven one, and a buyer should weigh it as exactly what it is.
There is no joint-venture partner. The group's own announcement of August 2024 said it would develop without joint ventures, and no JV entity appears on any filing for this plot.
Who Owns the Land, and What Is Not on the Public Record
The land under Neopolis was sold by HMDA through MSTC e-auctions. A 7.721-acre lot at Neopolis Phase 1 was bought on 16 July 2021 at ₹42.2 crore an acre, a total of ₹325.83 crore, and the bidder was MSN Laboratories Pvt Ltd, the group's pharmaceutical company. That the lot is this plot is a strong match on acreage and survey record rather than a fact read off a title document, and this page labels it that way.
Note the chronology, because it is the whole point. The land was bought in July 2021. MSN Urban Ventures LLP was incorporated two months later, on 16 September 2021. How Plot No. 1 came from the group company that bought it to the LLP that is developing it — by conveyance, or under a development agreement — is not established. No sale deed, no MCA charge and no RERA landowner disclosure was reachable.
So this site does not write that MSN Urban Ventures LLP owns the land. It writes that the LLP is the promoter and developer of record, which is what the filings actually establish. For a buyer, the practical consequence is one line on a due-diligence list: ask to see the title chain and the development agreement, and ask which entity's name will appear as the vendor on your sale deed.
The Regulatory Position, Approval by Approval
| Approval | Reference | Date | What it is |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard Terms of Reference | — | Applied 23 May 2024, granted 3 June 2024 | The scoping stage that precedes an environmental clearance |
| Structural stability certificate | Number not recited | 27 May 2024 | Recited in the environmental clearance. The certifying body is not named in the order |
| EC application filed | — | 6 July 2024 | The application that led to the clearance below |
| Technical appraisal | — | Examined 12 September 2024 and 12 December 2024 | Two appraisal sittings ahead of the decision |
| Clearance approved | — | 9 January 2025 | The state environmental authority's decision |
| Environmental Clearance issued | Category B1, Schedule 8(b), Building and Construction | 11 February 2025 | The signed order. Verified |
| AAI height clearance | Numbers not recited | 5 October 2023, and a further five NOCs dated 26 October 2023 | Airports Authority of India, recited in the clearance. Five NOCs is consistent with five towers |
| Environmental consultant | M/s KKB Envirocare Consultants Pvt Ltd, Hyderabad | — | Named in the clearance |
| TG-RERA registration | P02400009393 | Not established | Published by the developer. Registry-unconfirmed. See below |
| HMDA building permission | 011159/BP/HMDA/2925/SKP/2024 | Not established | Published by the developer in its own site footer. No public HMDA or TG-bPASS lookup returned it |
| HMWS&SB water sanction | — | — | Not established. The clearance records HMWS&SB as the stated source and its condition 1.6 still requires the permission to be obtained |
| TGSPDCL power adequacy certificate | — | — | Not established. Condition 1.7 still requires it |
| Fire NOC | — | — | Not established |
| TGPCB Consent for Establishment | — | — | Not established |
| Occupancy or completion certificate | — | — | Not established. The project is under construction |
| Adverse regulatory history | — | Read 31 August 2026 | None. TG-RERA's orders, proceedings, public notices, revoked and defaulters lists return no occurrence of "MSN" |
One further point belongs here because Osman Sagar is close enough to raise it. Government Order Ms. No. 111 of 8 March 1996 prohibits building across 84 villages in the Osman Sagar and Himayat Sagar catchment. The clearance states explicitly that Kokapet is not among those 84 villages, so the prohibition that has stalled schemes elsewhere in this district does not bite on this parcel.
On RERA, read this before anything else
MSN Realty publishes TG RERA NO : P02400009393 in the footer of every page of its own website. That is verified as the developer's own published claim, and this page reports it as one.
It could not be confirmed in the registry. The Telangana RERA project search at the official portal is CAPTCHA-gated and was not defeated, and the captcha-free public GIS feed is Division-1 only and partial — it returns no MSN rows, but its silence is not evidence of non-registration either way.
The number does sit correctly in sequence. The same public feed places Prithvi Towers one integer below at P02400009392, with Godrej Madison Avenue at P02400009227 and Rajapushpa Skyra at P02400009520 bracketing it in the same Kokapet registration window. That is consistent with a genuine registration and inconsistent with a fabricated one. It is corroborative. It is not confirmation. The registered project name is likewise unverified, and TG-RERA may hold this project under a descriptive filing name exactly as the environmental clearance does.
So: treat P02400009393 as a developer-published claim and confirm it yourself on the official TG-RERA portal before any booking payment. This site does not describe One by MSN as RERA approved. It also does not carry the number P02400004321, which one broker page publishes for this project and which is wrong, and it does not repeat the claim that registration "is underway" — a number is published, it is simply unconfirmed.
The Programme, Exactly as Filed
Five residential towers, filed as three at 57 upper floors and two at 56, each with a helipad, over four to five basement levels and a ground floor, alongside a separate clubhouse block of five basements, ground and four upper floors.
| Tower as filed | Filed configuration |
|---|---|
| T1 | 4 basements, ground, a service floor, 57 upper floors and a helipad |
| T2 | 4 basements, ground, 56 upper floors and a helipad |
| T3 | 5 basements, ground, a service floor, 57 upper floors and a helipad |
| T4 | 5 basements, ground, 56 upper floors and a helipad |
| T5 | 5 basements, ground, a service floor, 57 upper floors and a helipad |
| Clubhouse block | 5 basements, ground and 4 upper floors |
⚠️ The clearance does not say which of AON, UNO, EKA, ODIN and ISA is T1, T2, T3, T4 or T5. That mapping is not established anywhere. Any page telling you that a named tower rises to a particular height, or sits over a particular number of basements, has filled in a link no document makes. This site uses the tower names when it describes amenities and unit sizes, because the developer's deck attaches those to names, and T1 to T5 when it describes filed floor and basement counts, because the order attaches those to numbers. The two vocabularies are kept apart on every page.
"Up to 57 upper floors" is the accurate short phrasing. The marketing's "55 floors" understates the building.
The services and the loads, as filed
| Item | Filed value |
|---|---|
| Total built-up area | 5,08,494.17 sq m, roughly 54.7 lakh sq ft on our own conversion |
| Car parking | 2,904 four-wheeler bays |
| Two-wheeler parking | 250 bays |
| Parking area | 1,27,531.33 sq m |
| Greenbelt | 3,185.42 sq m, 10.20 per cent of the site |
| Water requirement | 872 KLD in total, being 555 KLD fresh from HMWS&SB and 317 KLD recycled |
| Wastewater generated | 758 KLD |
| On-site sewage treatment plant | 910 KLD. Treated water reused for flushing and landscape, excess to the public sewer, sludge of 90 kg a day used in-house for gardening |
| Power | TGSPDCL, with diesel backup of 3 x 1,500 kVA and 1 x 750 kVA, being 5,250 kVA installed |
| Energy code | Bound to ECBC and ECBC-R by condition 1.10 of the clearance |
| Solid waste | 3,210 kg a day, being 1,285 kg biodegradable through an on-site organic waste converter and 1,925 kg non-biodegradable to an authorised agency |
| Construction and demolition waste | 6,779.92 tonnes |
| Environmental budget | ₹618 lakh capital and ₹149.5 lakh a year recurring |
| Project cost | ₹1,000 crore |
The land-use side of this — how the plot itself is divided between towers, parking, greenbelt and the clubhouse — is worked through on the masterplan page.
One Configuration, 660 Times
One by MSN is 4 BHK only, in two variants: 4 BHK + M, and 4 BHK + M + HO. There is no 3 BHK, no 3.5 BHK, no 4.5 BHK and no compact tier hidden in the lower floors. The smallest residence anywhere on the 7.717 acres is 5,250 sq ft saleable.
| Towers | Saleable area | Facings in the area statement | Configuration |
|---|---|---|---|
| AON and UNO | 7,460 sq ft | East and West | 4 BHK + M + HO |
| EKA and ODIN | 5,250 sq ft | East and West | 4 BHK + M |
| EKA and ODIN | 5,510 sq ft | North | 4 BHK + M |
| ISA | 6,465 sq ft | East and West | 4 BHK + M + HO |
Four distinct sizes inside a published range of 5,250 to 7,460 sq ft, with 12 ft ceiling to ceiling heights on the developer's own specification. The full carpet, balcony and common-area breakdown, and the one place where the developer's two sources disagree on Tower ISA, are on the floor plans page.
At 660 homes, a single configuration at this scale is genuinely unusual in this layout. Most large Neopolis schemes dilute, putting a smaller home into the same towers to widen the buyer pool, so the largest residences end up sharing lifts, lobbies and the clubhouse with homes half their size. Here the entire programme is one product. Hallmark Altus gives the overview conversation another local reference point without turning it into a price race; the useful question is whether the whole project logic fits the buyer.
What that is not, is low density, and this site will not tell you it is. Six hundred and sixty homes on 7.717 acres is about 85.5 homes per acre on our own arithmetic, which is denser than several named neighbours in the same micro-market. The distinction that holds up under checking is uniformity, not sparseness. If sparseness is what you are buying, this is the wrong project, and that density figure is the first number to test.
How many of the 660 are 5,250 sq ft and how many are 7,460 sq ft is not published, and no unit mix appears in any source behind this page. It is a fair question to put to the sales team in writing, because it decides how many neighbours you share the largest floor plates with.
Design, Construction and Who Is on Site
Shapoorji Pallonji Group was reported as the main contractor by Sakshi Post on 28 April 2026, and a Shapoorji logo appears in the partner strip on the developer's own website. That is the whole evidence base: one local report and a logo. It is not stated in any filing, and this page carries it with the attribution attached rather than as a fact of record.
The same report, on the same date, described excavation complete for all five basements, multiple towers at second floor with a third in progress. That is the only on-ground construction account we could source, it is from a single outlet on a single day, and it is now over a year old at the time of writing. This site publishes no completion percentage, and it will not tell you the project is "on schedule" or "nearing completion", because the evidence to support either sentence does not exist in public.
The developer's site also carries a strip of partner logos alongside Shapoorji's. It states no role for any of them, so this site asserts none. If a design, engineering or advisory credit matters to your decision, ask for it in writing and ask for the appointment letter behind it.
On the environmental side the clearance names M/s KKB Envirocare Consultants Pvt Ltd, Hyderabad as the consultant, and binds the project to ECBC and ECBC-R energy standards under condition 1.10. No green rating or certification is evidenced for this project — no IGBC, no LEED, no GRIHA — and this site publishes none.
The Timeline, With No Possession Date
| Milestone | Date |
|---|---|
| Land won at the HMDA Neopolis Phase 1 e-auction, by MSN Laboratories Pvt Ltd | 16 July 2021 |
| MSN Urban Ventures LLP incorporated | 16 September 2021 |
| AAI height clearances | 5 October 2023, and five further NOCs on 26 October 2023 |
| Terms of Reference application filed | 23 May 2024 |
| Structural stability certificate | 27 May 2024 |
| Standard Terms of Reference granted | 3 June 2024 |
| Environmental Clearance application filed | 6 July 2024 |
| Technical appraisal sittings | 12 September 2024 and 12 December 2024 |
| Environmental authority approval | 9 January 2025 |
| Environmental Clearance granted | 11 February 2025 |
| Sales deck authored | 17 April 2025 |
| Public launch | 18 to 19 April 2025 |
| Construction reported at second and third floor level, all five basements excavated | 28 April 2026, one local outlet |
| Filed completion date | Not established |
| Possession | Not established |
There is no possession date on this site, and that is a deliberate decision rather than an omission. The environmental clearance carries no completion date. The RERA-filed completion date sits behind the same CAPTCHA as the registration itself. The April 2025 launch release indicated December 2029, which is quotable only with that attribution. Property portals circulate February 2030 dates that split between the 1st and the 28th of the month — they disagree with each other by 27 days, which is the tell that they are estimates rather than filings.
Only a RERA-filed completion date carries a legal remedy for delay. Ask for it in writing, and check it against the registry entry rather than against a brochure.
Where the Filing and the Marketing Disagree
This is the reconciliation table, in full. In every row the filing is published and the marketing figure is disclosed beside it. Nothing is averaged and nothing is silently picked.
| Item | The marketing | The filing or the independent source | What this site publishes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Residences | 655 on the deck cover, the site counter and every press carrier | 660 in the signed clearance | 660, with 655 disclosed. The five-home gap is unexplained in every source and we do not speculate about it |
| Floors | 55 floors on the deck and the site counter | T1, T3 and T5 at 57 upper floors plus a helipad; T2 and T4 at 56 plus a helipad, over four to five basements and ground | The filed configuration. Note the direction: developer marketing usually inflates, and here it understates the building by two floors |
| Cost | ₹2,750 crore planned investment, from the April 2025 launch release | ₹1,000 crore total project cost, in the signed clearance | Both, labelled. They are different bases. An environmental-clearance project cost is a capital and construction figure; ₹2,750 crore reads as total investment or gross development value including land. ₹2,750 crore is not a project cost |
| Tower ISA size | 6,345 sq ft on the enquiry form on the developer's own site | 6,465 sq ft in the deck's own area statement | 6,465 sq ft. The deck's figure reconciles exactly against its own carpet, balcony and common breakdown; the site's reconciles to nothing. Both are the developer's own sources |
| Clubhouses | "7 Grand Clubhouses" on a developer blog post of 16 July 2026 | One clubhouse block, filed at five basements, ground and four upper floors | One clubhouse, described alongside the five tower amenity suites and the Sky Park. The number seven is a relabelling of tower amenity floors |
| Homes per floor | "2 homes per floor" on the same developer blog | 660 homes across five towers of about 56 floors averages about 2.36 | Neither, as a project-wide fact. Two per floor is arithmetically impossible across all five towers. It may be true of the largest towers only, and which ones cannot be established |
| Amenity area | deck 1,80,000 sq ft; the site separately advertises "over 70,000 sq ft of stilt amenities" | — | 1,80,000 sq ft. The 70,000 is a subset the deck does not break out. The two must never be added together |
| Sky Park height | deck 2,597 ft above mean sea level; the site says 200 m above ground level | Ground here is about 562 m above mean sea level, so 2,597 ft works out to roughly 230 m above ground on our arithmetic | Either figure, always with its own qualifier. 2,597 ft is above sea level, not above the ground. Mixing the two produces a number that is simply false |
| Swimming pools | the launch release says "three swimming pools" | the deck never says three | Only with that attribution. The deck lists a temperature-controlled pool, a pool and deck jacuzzi, an aqua gym and the sky infinity pool |
| Site area | 7.7 acres | 31,229.59 sq m, being 7.717 acres | Either. There is no conflict here |
| Locality | Neopolis, Kokapet | Kokapet revenue village, Gandipet mandal, Rangareddy district | Kokapet and Neopolis. Portals filing this project under Narsingi or Khanapur are wrong |
What Is Circulating That Is Simply Wrong
Fifteen live broker microsites publish specifications for this project, several carrying figures that appear in no filing and in no developer document. A buyer arriving from one of them deserves a plain answer, so here it is. We rebut the claim and we do not name or link the source.
- "3 BHK" and "4.5 BHK" at One by MSN. There is no 3 BHK and no 4.5 BHK. The project is 4 BHK only, in two variants.
- "2,500 to 4,000 sq ft" and a "₹3.5 crore" ticket. The smallest residence is 5,250 sq ft saleable. Any ticket built on a smaller home is describing a different building. That programme is a hybrid of this plot's tower count and numbers belonging to neither this project nor MSN's separate Plot 06 scheme.
- "700 apartments." The clearance files 660. The developer markets 655. Nobody publishes 700.
- "Six towers." Five, plus a separate clubhouse block. Five AAI height NOCs were issued on 26 October 2023, which is consistent with five.
- "7.75 acres." The filed site area is 31,229.59 sq m, being 7.717 acres.
- RERA number P02400004321. Wrong. The number the developer publishes is P02400009393, and even that is unconfirmed in the registry.
- "RERA registration is underway." Also wrong. A number is published. It is unconfirmed, which is a different problem and needs a different answer.
One more separation matters. MSN has a second Neopolis project on Plot No. 06, 596 m east-northeast of this plot, with its own separate filings, and it is not this project. Nothing on this site describes Plot 06, and any page that merges the two is describing something that does not exist.
What Is Not Established
Said plainly, because a blank is a finding and not a hole to be filled.
- The filed completion date. Behind the TG-RERA CAPTCHA. One search at a counter closes it.
- Registry confirmation of P02400009393, and the registered project name and promoter on that record.
- HMDA building permission 011159/BP/HMDA/2925/SKP/2024 as an independently verified number, rather than a developer-published one.
- Whether Plot No. 1 was conveyed to MSN Urban Ventures LLP or is being developed under an agreement with the group company that bought it at auction.
- The mapping of T1 to T5 onto AON, UNO, EKA, ODIN and ISA.
- Any price at any level, and the developer's entire charge schedule.
- HMWS&SB water sanction, TGSPDCL power adequacy certificate, fire NOC and TGPCB Consent for Establishment.
- Construction progress beyond the single report of 28 April 2026.
- Any award, rating or green certification. None is evidenced.
Each of those is a question to put to the sales team in writing, and the answers are worth more than any brochure page.
Send a One by MSN Enquiry
The filing and the brochure disagree on the residence count and the floor count. Ask the sales team which number appears on the RERA certificate and on the sanctioned drawing, and ask for both documents rather than a summary.
Talk to a Sales ConsultantFrequently Asked Questions
Overview - One by MSN FAQs
MSN Realty publishes TG-RERA number P02400009393 in the footer of every page of its own website, and that is a genuine developer claim. We could not confirm the entry in the registry itself, because the Telangana RERA project search is protected by a CAPTCHA and the captcha-free public GIS project feed is partial and returns no MSN rows, so its silence proves nothing either way. The number does sit correctly in sequence against neighbouring Kokapet registrations, which supports its authenticity without establishing it. Treat it as a developer-published claim and verify it yourself on the official TG-RERA portal before you pay any booking amount.
Verified and in hand is the Environmental Clearance of 11 February 2025 from the state environmental authority, granted under Category B1, Schedule 8(b), following a Standard Terms of Reference of 3 June 2024. The clearance also recites an Airports Authority of India height clearance dated 5 October 2023 with five further NOCs dated 26 October 2023, which is consistent with five towers, and a structural stability certificate of 27 May 2024. The developer publishes HMDA building permission 011159/BP/HMDA/2925/SKP/2024, which no public HMDA or TG-bPASS lookup returned, so read it as developer-published rather than independently confirmed. Still outstanding, or at least not established, are the HMWS&SB water sanction, the TGSPDCL power adequacy certificate, the fire NOC and the pollution board's consent to establish. The clearance itself carries the water and power permissions as conditions to be obtained, so ask for each of them as it is granted. One further point on the record is worth knowing, because Osman Sagar is close enough to raise it: the clearance states explicitly that Kokapet is not among the 84 catchment villages listed in GO Ms No. 111 of 8 March 1996, so the building prohibition that has stalled schemes elsewhere in this district does not bite on this parcel.
660. That is the number filed in the signed environmental clearance granted on 11 February 2025. The developer's own sales deck and website market 655 residences, and every property portal and broker page repeats the 655. We publish the filed figure and disclose the marketed one beside it. As to why they differ, we do not know and we are not going to invent a reason: the five-home difference is not explained in any source we could find. What we can say is which document each number comes from. The 655 is the developer's marketing figure, printed on the deck cover and driving the counter on its own website; the 660 is the figure in the promoter's own filing, carried into an order signed by the state environmental authority. Where marketing and a filing disagree, this site publishes the filing, discloses the marketing figure, and averages neither.
Five residential towers, plus a separate clubhouse block. The developer names the towers AON, UNO, EKA, ODIN and ISA. The environmental clearance and the deck agree on the count of five, and five separate Airports Authority height NOCs were issued in October 2023, which is consistent with it. Pages advertising six towers for this project are wrong.
No, and it is worth being straight about it. At 660 homes on 7.717 acres the density is about 85.5 homes per acre on our own arithmetic, which is higher than Brigade Gateway at Neopolis at about 61 per acre, APR Olympia at about 63 and My Home 99 at about 57. Any page selling you exclusivity on a per-acre basis here is making a claim that a single division defeats. What genuinely distinguishes One by MSN is uniformity rather than sparseness: it is 4 BHK only, with nothing smaller anywhere on the plot, at a scale no other single-configuration project in Kokapet attempts.
Thinner than any page should imply. The only on-ground report we could source is a single local outlet on 28 April 2026, which described excavation as complete for all five basements, several towers at second-floor level with a third in progress, and Shapoorji Pallonji as the contractor on site. That is one outlet, once. This site therefore publishes no completion percentage, no "on schedule" claim and no "nearing completion" language, because there is no evidence base for any of them. The project's status is under construction, and the honest way to update it is a site visit.