Every image on this page is an artistic impression. No tower at One by MSN is finished - the project is under construction, and on the single on-ground report available, published by Sakshi Post on 28 April 2026, excavation was complete for all five basements with multiple towers at second-floor level and a third in progress. There is therefore no photograph of a completed building to publish, and any page presenting one is not showing you this project.
Treat what follows as an illustration of intent. The documents that govern what actually gets built are the sanctioned HMDA drawings and the agreement of sale, and no render is a substitute for either. Each caption below says what the image shows, what a buyer can take from it, and where the image runs ahead of the record.
The Tower Skyline
The five towers of One by MSN on Plot No. 1 of the Neopolis layout at Kokapet, filed at up to 57 upper floors each.
The massing is the one thing about this project that is settled by a signed document. The signed environmental clearance of 11 February 2025 files five residential towers plus a separate clubhouse block on 7.717 acres - three towers at 57 upper floors with a helipad and two at 56, each over four to five basement levels and a ground floor. The developer's own marketing says 55 floors, which understates the filing. What an image like this cannot tell you is which of the named towers - AON, UNO, EKA, ODIN and ISA - is which of the filed towers, because no document maps the two vocabularies onto each other. Count towers from a render; take floor counts from the order.
The Clubhouse
The central clubhouse block, filed as five basements, ground and four upper floors.
This is one building, and the distinction matters. The environmental clearance files a single clubhouse block, and the deck describes one clubhouse, which its own copy calls yacht-shaped. A developer blog post of July 2026 describes seven grand clubhouses; that is relabelling the five towers' amenity floors, and the filing records one block. Inside it the deck places the gym, the spa, salon and sauna, the banquet and party spaces, guest rooms, badminton courts and the studio programme.
The Sky Park Infinity Pool
The Sky Park, which the developer places at 2,597 ft above mean sea level - roughly 230 m above ground.
Read that qualifier carefully, because it is the single most misquoted number on this project. 2,597 ft is above mean sea level, not above the ground. Ground here is about 562 m above sea level, so the derived height above ground is roughly 230 m on our own arithmetic, and the developer's own website separately states 200 m above ground level. The two are 30 m apart, which is within survey error plus excavation. The deck puts a sky infinity pool, sky gym, sky yoga, a sky cinema, a sky library, a sky walk, a sky garden and a stargazing deck up there.
The Living Room
Living areas at a 12 ft ceiling to ceiling height, in residences of 5,250 to 7,460 sq ft saleable.
The 12 ft figure is the developer's specification and it is a ceiling-to-ceiling dimension, not the finished clear height you will stand under, which is lower by the slab and the ceiling build-up and is not published. The four saleable sizes are 5,250, 5,510, 6,465 and 7,460 sq ft, and the carpet area behind them runs from 3,064 to 4,204 sq ft. The floor plans page breaks every one of those into carpet, balcony and common area.
The Master Suite
The master suite, which the developer's deck describes with a walk-in dresser, the master bedroom and a lounge area.
This is the room the deck sells hardest, and it is the room a render flatters most easily. What is checkable is the area statement behind it rather than the styling in front of it. Ask for the dimensioned sanctioned plan for your specific unit and facing, and compare the room sizes against the drawing rather than against the image.
The Balcony View
Osman Sagar's nearest mapped shoreline is 885 m south of the plot; the lake view is the developer's claim.
The proximity is a measured fact from mapped water geometry. The view is not. The deck markets "25,000 acres of uninterrupted views" and describes the project as overlooking Osman Sagar, and that is quoted here as the developer's claim rather than restated as ours. Whether a given home sees the lake depends on its tower, its facing, its floor and on what is eventually built on the plots in between, none of which is settled - and the deck's own area statement prints east, west and north facings with no south row. A render is the least reliable possible evidence of a sightline. Ask which tower, which facing and which floor, and ask what is approved for the ground in between.
The Tower Lobby
Private tower lobbies, one of the developer's stated differentiators alongside concierge services.
Each tower carries its own lobby and its own amenity suite, and the deck also lists concierge services and dual entry and exit gates among the project's service claims. Services are the part of an amenity programme that depends on a management contract rather than on a drawing, so the useful question here is not what the lobby looks like but who staffs it, under what contract, and at what monthly charge. No maintenance rate has been published for this project.
The Landscaped Podium
The filed greenbelt is 3,185.42 sq m, 10.20 percent of the 31,229.59 sq m site.
This is the one landscape number that comes from a signed order rather than a brochure, and it is worth holding next to the render. The same order files 1,27,531.33 sq m of parking, a figure it puts at 33.47 percent of the built-up area net of the parking itself rather than of the site, along with 2,904 four-wheeler and 250 two-wheeler bays. Green space and parking are the two claims on open ground that compete with each other, and both are on the record here.
What No Image on This Page Can Settle
A render is a design intent, produced before the building exists, and it is the weakest form of evidence in the whole document set. It cannot tell you the finished clear ceiling height, the actual view from your floor, which named tower carries which filed floor count, what the amenities will cost to run, or when any of it will be handed over - no completion date appears in the environmental clearance and none has been established elsewhere.
The things that can be checked, can be checked on paper today: the signed environmental clearance, the sanctioned HMDA drawings, the TG-RERA record, and the written agreement of sale. Ask for those four, and use the images for what they are worth, which is a sense of the ambition rather than a record of the result.
Contact Us About One by MSN Imagery
A render is the least reliable evidence of a sightline there is. Ask which tower, which facing and which floor your view is being promised from, and ask what is approved for the plots in between.
Talk to a Sales ConsultantFrequently Asked Questions
Gallery - One by MSN FAQs
Five residential towers, plus a separate clubhouse block. The developer names the towers AON, UNO, EKA, ODIN and ISA. The environmental clearance and the deck agree on the count of five, and five separate Airports Authority height NOCs were issued in October 2023, which is consistent with it. Pages advertising six towers for this project are wrong.
One. The environmental clearance files a single clubhouse block of five basements, ground and four upper floors, and the deck describes one yacht-shaped clubhouse. Separately, each of the five towers carries its own amenity suite, and there is a Sky Park at the top of the scheme; the developer puts the combined total at 1,80,000 sq ft of clubhouse, Sky Park and amenities. A developer blog post of July 2026 describes seven grand clubhouses. That is relabelling the tower amenity floors, and this site does not carry the number seven. Note too that the developer's website separately mentions over 70,000 sq ft of stilt amenities, which is a subset of the 1,80,000 sq ft and must not be added to it.
The deck places the Sky Park at 2,597 ft above mean sea level, and the developer's website separately describes it as 200 m above ground level. Those are two different qualifiers, not two different claims, and mixing them produces a fabrication. Ground level at the filed coordinate is about 562 m above mean sea level, so 2,597 ft, which is 791.6 m, works out to roughly 230 m above ground on our own arithmetic. That derived figure sits within elevation-survey error and excavation of the developer's own stated 200 m. What matters is that 2,597 ft is above sea level and not above the ground, and several pages about this project get that wrong.
Thinner than any page should imply. The only on-ground report we could source is a single local outlet on 28 April 2026, which described excavation as complete for all five basements, several towers at second-floor level with a third in progress, and Shapoorji Pallonji as the contractor on site. That is one outlet, once. This site therefore publishes no completion percentage, no "on schedule" claim and no "nearing completion" language, because there is no evidence base for any of them. The project's status is under construction, and the honest way to update it is a site visit.
Osman Sagar's nearest mapped shoreline is 885 m south of the plot. That proximity is independently established from mapped water geometry and is a fact. The view is the developer's claim, not ours. The deck markets uninterrupted views across 25,000 acres and describes the project as overlooking Osman Sagar, and whether any given home actually sees the lake depends on its tower, its facing, its floor and on what is eventually built on the plots in between, none of which is settled. Proximity is measurable. A sightline from an unbuilt floor is not. Ask the sales team which tower, which facing and from what floor, and then ask what is approved for the plots between.